GPT Audio vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 39.8× cheaper than GPT Audio on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has the larger context window (262K vs 128K).
| GPT Audio | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.08 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.11 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.04 |
| Context window | 128K | 262K |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 12.9 |
| Coding index | — | 26.8 |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | 2026-08-11 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT Audio or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 39.8× cheaper than GPT Audio on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT Audio vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?
GPT Audio: 128,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT Audio ≈ $10,000, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00.
More comparisons
GPT Audio vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT Audio vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT Audio vs Command A+GPT Audio vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT Audio vs GPT-6 LunaGPT Audio vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT Audio vs GPT-6 SolGPT Audio vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT Audio vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT Audio vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT Audio vs Grok 4.7GPT Audio vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT Audio vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT Audio vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT Audio vs GPT-6 AstraGPT Audio vs GPT-6 Astra ProNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GLM 5.3 PrimeNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Command A+Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 Luna ProNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 SolNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Claude Opus 5.5