GPT Audio vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 19.0× cheaper than GPT Audio on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
| GPT Audio | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.47 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.23 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.016 |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT Audio or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 19.0× cheaper than GPT Audio on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT Audio vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GPT Audio: 128,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT Audio ≈ $10,000, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.
More comparisons
GPT Audio vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT Audio vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT Audio vs Command A+GPT Audio vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT Audio vs GPT-6 LunaGPT Audio vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT Audio vs GPT-6 SolGPT Audio vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT Audio vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT Audio vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT Audio vs Grok 4.7GPT Audio vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT Audio vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT Audio vs GPT-6 AstraGPT Audio vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT Audio vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5