GPT-6 Cyber vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 228.6× cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 922K).
| GPT-6 Cyber | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $20.00 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $100.00 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $40.00 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $2.00 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 922K | 1.1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 26.7 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 8 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-11-05 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Cyber or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 228.6× cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-6 Cyber vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-6 Cyber: 922,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6 Cyber ≈ $90,000, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
GPT-6 Cyber vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT-6 Cyber vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT-6 Cyber vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT-6 Cyber vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT-6 Cyber vs Hy4GPT-6 Cyber vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT-6 Cyber vs GPT-6.1 TerraGPT-6 Cyber vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-6 Cyber vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-6 Cyber vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-6 Cyber vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-6 Cyber vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-6 Cyber vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-6 Cyber vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 Cyber vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-6 Cyber vs Mistral Large 4MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Hy4MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro