GPT-5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 27.5× cheaper than GPT-5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 400K).
| GPT-5.2 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.75 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $14.00 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.81 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.17 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 400K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.2% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-12-10 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 27.5× cheaper than GPT-5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-5.2: 400,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-5.2 ≈ $10,500, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
GPT-5.2 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-5.2 vs Command A+GPT-5.2 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-5.2 vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-5.2 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-5.2 vs GPT-6 SolGPT-5.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-5.2 vs Grok 4.7GPT-5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-5.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-5.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-5.2 vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-5.2 vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT-5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5