GPT-5.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 17.2× cheaper than GPT-5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-5.1 has the larger context window (400K vs 131K).
| GPT-5.1 | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.25 | $0.20 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.44 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.13 | — |
| Context window | 400K | 131K |
| Max output | 128K | 118K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 49.4 | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2025-11-13 | 2026-06-04 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 17.2× cheaper than GPT-5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-5.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-5.1: 400,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-5.1 ≈ $7,500, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.
More comparisons
GPT-5.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-5.1 vs Command A+GPT-5.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-5.1 vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-5.1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-5.1 vs GPT-6 SolGPT-5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-5.1 vs Grok 4.7GPT-5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-5.1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-5.1 vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GLM 5.3 PrimeNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Command A+Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 Luna ProNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 SolNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Claude Opus 5.5