GPT-3.5 Turbo vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4.3× cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 16K).
| GPT-3.5 Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.50 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.50 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.75 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 16K | 1M |
| Max output | 4K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 10.7 | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.6% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2023-05-28 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4.3× cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-3.5 Turbo: 16,385 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-3.5 Turbo ≈ $1,750, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Command A+GPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-6 SolGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-3.5 Turbo vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Grok 4.7GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-3.5 Turbo vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-3.5 Turbo vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5