GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen (Alibaba)
$1.03 / $6.16
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
Q
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 3.9× cheaper than Qwen3.6 Max Preview on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXQwen3.6 Max Preview
Input price / 1M$0.37$1.03
Output price / 1M$1.25$6.16
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$2.31
Cached input / 1M$0.09
Context window1M262K
Max output131K66K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182026-04-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

GLM 5.3 FlashX is 3.9× cheaper than Qwen3.6 Max Preview on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Qwen3.6 Max Preview ≈ $5,135.

More comparisons