GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
Q
Verdict: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is 30% cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.15
Output price / 1M$1.25$1.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.41
Cached input / 1M$0.09
Context window1M262K
Max output131K236K
Intelligence index
Coding index17.4
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182025-09-11
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is 30% cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking ≈ $900.00.

More comparisons