GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.027 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
M
Verdict: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 8.4× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 60K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXLlama 3.2 1B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.027
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.0705
Cached input / 1M$0.09
Context window1M60K
Max output131K54K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-182024-09-25
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 8.4× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: 60,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct ≈ $154.50.

More comparisons