GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
S

Llama 3 8B Lunaris

Sao10k
$0.04 / $0.05
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
S
Verdict: Llama 3 8B Lunaris is 13.9× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXLlama 3 8B Lunaris
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.04
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.05
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.0425
Cached input / 1M$0.09
Context window1M8K
Max output131K7K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-182024-08-13
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Llama 3 8B Lunaris?

Llama 3 8B Lunaris is 13.9× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3 8B Lunaris: 8,192 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Llama 3 8B Lunaris ≈ $105.00.

More comparisons