GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Kimi K2 Thinking
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 45% cheaper than Kimi K2 Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | Kimi K2 Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.37 | $0.60 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.25 | $2.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.59 | $1.07 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.09 | $0.15 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 131K | 98K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | 21 |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-18 | 2025-11-06 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Kimi K2 Thinking?
GLM 5.3 FlashX is 45% cheaper than Kimi K2 Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Kimi K2 Thinking: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Kimi K2 Thinking: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Kimi K2 Thinking ≈ $2,450.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Command A+GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 FlashX vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 FlashX vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.3 FlashX vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Kimi K2 Thinking vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K2 Thinking vs Command A+Kimi K2 Thinking vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K2 Thinking vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K2 Thinking vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K2 Thinking vs GPT-6 SolKimi K2 Thinking vs Claude Opus 5.5