GLM 5.2 vs Hy3 preview
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy3 preview is 3.5× cheaper than GLM 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (33.7 vs 25.3). GLM 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| GLM 5.2 | Hy3 preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.18 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.04 | $0.60 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.00 | $0.29 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.12 | $0.06 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 131K | 236K |
| Intelligence index | 33.7 | 25.3 |
| Coding index | 68.8 | 58.8 |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-06-16 | 2026-04-22 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or Hy3 preview?
Hy3 preview is 3.5× cheaper than GLM 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.2 vs Hy3 preview: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens. Hy3 preview: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.2 ≈ $2,320, Hy3 preview ≈ $660.00.
More comparisons
GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.2 vs Command A+GLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.2 vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 Astra ProHy3 preview vs GLM 5.3 PrimeHy3 preview vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeHy3 preview vs Command A+Hy3 preview vs GPT-6 Luna ProHy3 preview vs GPT-6 LunaHy3 preview vs GPT-6 Sol ProHy3 preview vs GPT-6 SolHy3 preview vs Claude Opus 5.5