GLM 4.6 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 6.9× cheaper than GLM 4.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has the larger context window (262K vs 205K).
| GLM 4.6 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.43 | $0.08 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.75 | $0.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.76 | $0.11 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.08 | $0.04 |
| Context window | 205K | 262K |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 12.9 |
| Coding index | 45.8 | 26.8 |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-09-30 | 2026-08-11 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 4.6 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 6.9× cheaper than GLM 4.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 4.6 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 4.6: 204,800 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 4.6 ≈ $1,735, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00.
More comparisons
GLM 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 4.6 vs Command A+GLM 4.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 4.6 vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 4.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 4.6 vs GPT-6 SolGLM 4.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 4.6 vs Grok 4.7GLM 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 4.6 vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 4.6 vs GPT-6 Astra ProNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GLM 5.3 PrimeNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Command A+Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 Luna ProNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 SolNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Claude Opus 5.5