GLM 4.6 vs Grok 4.7
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 4.6 is 3.2× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 205K).
| GLM 4.6 | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.43 | $1.60 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.75 | $4.80 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.76 | $2.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.08 | $0.40 |
| Context window | 205K | 500K |
| Max output | 16K | 450K |
| Intelligence index | — | 46.4 |
| Coding index | 45.8 | — |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-09-30 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 4.6 or Grok 4.7?
GLM 4.6 is 3.2× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 4.6 vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 4.6: 204,800 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 4.6 ≈ $1,735, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.
More comparisons
GLM 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 4.6 vs Command A+GLM 4.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 4.6 vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 4.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 4.6 vs GPT-6 SolGLM 4.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 4.6 vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 4.6 vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5