GLM 4.5V vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 4.5V

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.60 / $1.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 4.5× cheaper than GLM 4.5V on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has the larger context window (131K vs 66K).
GLM 4.5VNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.60$0.20
Output price / 1M$1.80$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.90$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.11
Context window66K131K
Max output16K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2025-08-112026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5V or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 4.5× cheaper than GLM 4.5V on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 4.5V vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 4.5V: 65,536 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 4.5V ≈ $2,100, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons