Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Google
$0.09 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
N
Verdict: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 29% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemma 4 26B A4B has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Gemma 4 26B A4B Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.09$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.30$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.14$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.05
Context window262K131K
Max output236K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index39.3
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-04-032026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Gemma 4 26B A4B is 29% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Gemma 4 26B A4B : 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 4 26B A4B ≈ $330.00, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons