Gemma 3 4B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Gemma 3 4B is 3.2× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| Gemma 3 4B | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.05 | $0.20 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.10 | $0.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0625 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 131K | 131K |
| Max output | 16K | 118K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 2.7 | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | No |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-06-04 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?
Gemma 3 4B is 3.2× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemma 3 4B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?
Gemma 3 4B: 131,072 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 3 4B ≈ $150.00, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.
More comparisons
Gemma 3 4B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGemma 3 4B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGemma 3 4B vs Command A+Gemma 3 4B vs GPT-6 Luna ProGemma 3 4B vs GPT-6 LunaGemma 3 4B vs GPT-6 Sol ProGemma 3 4B vs GPT-6 SolGemma 3 4B vs Claude Opus 5.5Gemma 3 4B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGemma 3 4B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGemma 3 4B vs Grok 4.7Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGemma 3 4B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGemma 3 4B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 3 4B vs GPT-6 AstraGemma 3 4B vs GPT-6 Astra ProNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GLM 5.3 PrimeNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Command A+Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 Luna ProNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 SolNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Claude Opus 5.5