Gemini 4 Argon vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

Google
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.05 / $0.33
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is 33.3× cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 4 Argon has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Gemini 4 ArgonLlama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.05
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.33
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.12
Cached input / 1M$0.10—
Context window1M131K
Max output944K118K
Intelligence index50.4—
Coding index——
Providers6—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-132024-09-25
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is 33.3× cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 4 Argon vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Argon: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 4 Argon ≈ $9,000, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct ≈ $265.00.

More comparisons