Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)

Google

$0.50 / $3.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA

$0.20 / $0.20

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 5.6× cheaper than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has the larger context window (131K vs 66K).

	Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)	Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M	$0.50	$0.20
Output price / 1M	$3.00	$0.20
Blended price (3:1)	$1.13	$0.20
Cached input / 1M	—	—
Context window	66K	131K
Max output	59K	118K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	—	1
Best provider uptime (30m)	—	—
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	No	No
Released	2026-02-26	2026-06-04
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 5.6× cheaper than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview): 65,536 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) ≈ $2,500, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons