Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Google
$1.25 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 9.5× cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.6 35B A3B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (18.2 vs 16.1). Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Gemini 2.5 ProQwen3.6 35B A3B
Input price / 1M$1.25$0.15
Output price / 1M$10.00$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$3.44$0.36
Cached input / 1M$0.13$0.05
Context window1M262K
Max output66K236K
Intelligence index16.118.2
Coding index33.341.9
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-06-172026-04-27
Retirement2026-10-20

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 9.5× cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 2.5 Pro ≈ $7,500, Qwen3.6 35B A3B ≈ $800.00.

More comparisons