Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Google

$0.30 / $2.50

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama

$0.10 / $0.30

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 5.7× cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).

	Gemini 2.5 Flash	Llama 4 Scout
Input price / 1M	$0.30	$0.10
Output price / 1M	$2.50	$0.30
Blended price (3:1)	$0.85	$0.15
Cached input / 1M	$0.03	—
Context window	1M	1.3M
Max output	66K	16K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	8.2
Providers	—	4
Best provider uptime (30m)	—	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2025-06-17	2025-04-05
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is 5.7× cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 2.5 Flash ≈ $1,850, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.

More comparisons