Fugu Ultra v2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Sakana

Fugu Ultra v2

Sakana
$5.00 / $30.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Sakana
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 48.9× cheaper than Fugu Ultra v2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Fugu Ultra v2Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M$5.00$0.15
Output price / 1M$30.00$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$11.25$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.50$0.02
Context window1M1M
Max output128K944K
Intelligence index—13.6
Coding index——
Providers—10
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-112026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Fugu Ultra v2 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 48.9× cheaper than Fugu Ultra v2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

Fugu Ultra v2: 1,000,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Fugu Ultra v2 ≈ $25,000, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons