Fugu Ultra v2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

S

Fugu Ultra v2

Sakana
$5.00 / $30.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
S
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 56.3× cheaper than Fugu Ultra v2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Fugu Ultra v2 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Fugu Ultra v2Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$5.00$0.20
Output price / 1M$30.00$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$11.25$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.50
Context window1M131K
Max output128K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-112026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Fugu Ultra v2 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 56.3× cheaper than Fugu Ultra v2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Fugu Ultra v2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Fugu Ultra v2: 1,000,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Fugu Ultra v2 ≈ $25,000, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons