Extract vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Extract is 22.0× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Extract has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| Extract | Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.04 | $0.18 |
| Output price / 1M | Free | $2.10 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.03 | $0.66 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 900K | 33K |
| Intelligence index | — | 8.2 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-13 | 2025-10-14 |
| Retirement | — | 2026-10-09 |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Extract or Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?
Extract is 22.0× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Extract vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?
Extract: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Extract ≈ $80.00, Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking ≈ $1,410.
More comparisons
Extract vs Gemini 4 CarbonExtract vs Claude Fable 5.2Extract vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashExtract vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashExtract vs Hy4Extract vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalExtract vs GPT-6.1 TerraExtract vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProExtract vs Kimi K3.1 ProExtract vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashExtract vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Extract vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLExtract vs Gemini 4 ArgonExtract vs Claude Haiku 5.5Extract vs Nano Banana 2.1Extract vs Mistral Large 4Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking vs Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3 VL 8B Thinking vs Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashQwen3 VL 8B Thinking vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3 VL 8B Thinking vs Hy4Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3 VL 8B Thinking vs GPT-6.1 TerraQwen3 VL 8B Thinking vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro