Ember-1 vs Llama Guard 4 12B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 33.3× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ember-1 has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
| Ember-1 | Llama Guard 4 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $3.00 | $0.18 |
| Output price / 1M | $15.00 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $6.00 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.30 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 164K |
| Max output | 944K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-09-24 | 2025-04-30 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Llama Guard 4 12B?
Llama Guard 4 12B is 33.3× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ember-1 vs Llama Guard 4 12B: which has a bigger context window?
Ember-1: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ember-1 ≈ $13,500, Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
Ember-1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeEmber-1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeEmber-1 vs Command A+Ember-1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProEmber-1 vs GPT-6 LunaEmber-1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProEmber-1 vs GPT-6 SolEmber-1 vs Claude Opus 5.5Ember-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedEmber-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashEmber-1 vs Grok 4.7Ember-1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashEmber-1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXEmber-1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashEmber-1 vs GPT-6 AstraEmber-1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5