DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Switchyard
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Switchyard | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.045 | — |
| Output price / 1M | $0.50 | — |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.16 | — |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.006 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 944K | — |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 40 | 0 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-09-10 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Switchyard?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Switchyard are priced identically.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Switchyard: which has a bigger context window?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Switchyard: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $340.00, Switchyard ≈ $0.
More comparisons
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Mistral Large 4DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Command A+Switchyard vs GPT-6.1 TerraSwitchyard vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProSwitchyard vs Kimi K3.1 ProSwitchyard vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashSwitchyard vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Switchyard vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLSwitchyard vs Gemini 4 ArgonSwitchyard vs Claude Haiku 5.5