DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

D

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

DeepSeek
$0.0886 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
D
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 19% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.2 vs 22.6). DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input price / 1M$0.0886$0.06
Output price / 1M$0.18$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.0177$0.012
Context window1M262K
Max output384K236K
Intelligence index24.222.6
Coding index56.255.6
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-04-242026-08-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 19% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 ≈ $265.80, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons