DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

DeepSeek

$0.27 / $1.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)

$2.00 / $6.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is 6.6× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (45.4 vs 14.8). Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).

	DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus	Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M	$0.27	$2.00
Output price / 1M	$1.00	$6.00
Blended price (3:1)	$0.45	$3.00
Cached input / 1M	$0.14	$0.25
Context window	164K	1M
Max output	33K	131K
Intelligence index	14.8	45.4
Coding index	43.5	76.2
Providers	—	1
Best provider uptime (30m)	—	100.0%
Vision input	No	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2025-09-22	2026-09-03
Retirement	2026-09-28	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is 6.6× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus ≈ $1,040, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons