R1 Distill Llama 70B vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

R1 Distill Llama 70B

DeepSeek
$0.80 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 16.2× cheaper than R1 Distill Llama 70B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
R1 Distill Llama 70BGLM 5.3 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.80$0.0399
Output price / 1M$0.80$0.0784
Blended price (3:1)$0.80$0.0495
Cached input / 1M—$0.03
Context window8K1M
Max output7K131K
Intelligence index—27.8
Coding index—71.5
Providers—42
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-01-232026-08-26
Retirement2026-09-28—

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, R1 Distill Llama 70B or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 16.2× cheaper than R1 Distill Llama 70B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

R1 Distill Llama 70B vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

R1 Distill Llama 70B: 8,192 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 Distill Llama 70B ≈ $2,000, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00.

More comparisons