R1 0528 vs Llama Guard 4 12B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 5.1× cheaper than R1 0528 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| R1 0528 | Llama Guard 4 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.50 | $0.18 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.15 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.91 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.35 | — |
| Context window | 164K | 164K |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2025-05-28 | 2025-04-30 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or Llama Guard 4 12B?
Llama Guard 4 12B is 5.1× cheaper than R1 0528 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
R1 0528 vs Llama Guard 4 12B: which has a bigger context window?
R1 0528: 163,840 tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 0528 ≈ $2,075, Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
R1 0528 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeR1 0528 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeR1 0528 vs Command A+R1 0528 vs GPT-6 Luna ProR1 0528 vs GPT-6 LunaR1 0528 vs GPT-6 Sol ProR1 0528 vs GPT-6 SolR1 0528 vs Claude Opus 5.5R1 0528 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedR1 0528 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashR1 0528 vs Grok 4.7R1 0528 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashR1 0528 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXR1 0528 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashR1 0528 vs GPT-6 AstraR1 0528 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5