DeepSeek V3 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 9.3× cheaper than DeepSeek V3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
| DeepSeek V3 | GLM 5.3 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.32 | $0.0399 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.89 | $0.0784 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.46 | $0.0495 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.03 |
| Context window | 164K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 27.8 |
| Coding index | — | 71.5 |
| Providers | — | 42 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2024-12-26 | 2026-08-26 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 or GLM 5.3 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 9.3× cheaper than DeepSeek V3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
DeepSeek V3 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
DeepSeek V3: 163,840 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V3 ≈ $1,085, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00.
More comparisons
DeepSeek V3 vs Gemini 4 CarbonDeepSeek V3 vs Claude Fable 5.2DeepSeek V3 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashDeepSeek V3 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashDeepSeek V3 vs Hy4DeepSeek V3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalDeepSeek V3 vs GPT-6.1 TerraDeepSeek V3 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProDeepSeek V3 vs Kimi K3.1 ProDeepSeek V3 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashDeepSeek V3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek V3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLDeepSeek V3 vs Gemini 4 ArgonDeepSeek V3 vs Claude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V3 vs Nano Banana 2.1DeepSeek V3 vs Mistral Large 4GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro