Command R7B (12-2024) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Command R7B (12-2024)

Cohere

$0.0375 / $0.15

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA

$0.15 / $0.47

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Command R7B (12-2024) is 3.5× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).

	Command R7B (12-2024)	Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M	$0.0375	$0.15
Output price / 1M	$0.15	$0.47
Blended price (3:1)	$0.0656	$0.23
Cached input / 1M	—	$0.02
Context window	128K	1M
Max output	4K	944K
Intelligence index	—	13.6
Coding index	—	—
Providers	—	10
Best provider uptime (30m)	—	100.0%
Vision input	No	Yes
Reasoning	No	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2024-12-14	2026-10-15
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Command R7B (12-2024) or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Command R7B (12-2024) is 3.5× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Command R7B (12-2024) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

Command R7B (12-2024): 128,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command R7B (12-2024) ≈ $150.00, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons