Command A vs Llama Guard 4 12B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 24.3× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A has the larger context window (256K vs 164K).
| Command A | Llama Guard 4 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.18 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 256K | 164K |
| Max output | 8K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | 3 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2025-04-30 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or Llama Guard 4 12B?
Llama Guard 4 12B is 24.3× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs Llama Guard 4 12B: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
Command A vs Gemini 4 CarbonCommand A vs Claude Fable 5.2Command A vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashCommand A vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashCommand A vs Hy4Command A vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalCommand A vs GPT-6.1 TerraCommand A vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProCommand A vs Kimi K3.1 ProCommand A vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Command A vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLCommand A vs Gemini 4 ArgonCommand A vs Claude Haiku 5.5Command A vs Nano Banana 2.1Command A vs Mistral Large 4Llama Guard 4 12B vs Gemini 4 CarbonLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Fable 5.2Llama Guard 4 12B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs Hy4Llama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6.1 TerraLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro