Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Anthropic
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 17.4× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.15
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.016
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers81
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%99.4%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-282026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 17.4× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Sonnet 5.5 ≈ $9,000, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons