Claude Haiku 5.5 vs WizardLM-2 8x22B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Microsoft

WizardLM-2 8x22B

Microsoft
$0.62 / $0.62
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Microsoft
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 3.1× cheaper than WizardLM-2 8x22B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 66K).
Claude Haiku 5.5WizardLM-2 8x22B
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.62
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.62
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.62
Cached input / 1M$0.01—
Context window1M66K
Max output128K8K
Intelligence index36.5—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-072024-04-16
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or WizardLM-2 8x22B?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 3.1× cheaper than WizardLM-2 8x22B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs WizardLM-2 8x22B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. WizardLM-2 8x22B: 65,535 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, WizardLM-2 8x22B ≈ $1,550.

More comparisons