Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 13% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.8 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.01$0.016
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index36.5—
Coding index——
Providers102
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-072026-08-26
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 13% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, Qwen3.8 Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons