Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic

$0.10 / $0.50

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Google

$0.30 / $2.50

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 4.3× cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (36.5 vs 11.7). Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).

	Claude Haiku 5.5	Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Input price / 1M	$0.10	$0.30
Output price / 1M	$0.50	$2.50
Blended price (3:1)	$0.20	$0.85
Cached input / 1M	$0.01	$0.03
Context window	1M	1M
Max output	128K	66K
Intelligence index	36.5	11.7
Coding index	—	49.3
Providers	10	8
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-10-07	2026-07-21
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 4.3× cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ≈ $1,850.

More comparisons