Claude Fable 5.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Fable 5.1

Anthropic
$10.00 / $50.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.08 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 181.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (53.4 vs 12.9). Claude Fable 5.1 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Fable 5.1Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Input price / 1M$10.00$0.08
Output price / 1M$50.00$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$20.00$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.25$0.04
Context window1M262K
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index53.412.9
Coding index81.626.8
Providers44
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-012026-08-11
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 181.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.1: 1,000,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.1 ≈ $45,000, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00.

More comparisons