Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Kimi K3 is 3.3× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (53.4 vs 43.6). Kimi K3 has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
| Claude Fable 5.1 | Kimi K3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $10.00 | $3.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $50.00 | $15.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $20.00 | $6.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.25 | $0.30 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | 53.4 | 43.6 |
| Coding index | 81.6 | 76.2 |
| Providers | 4 | 20 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-01 | 2026-07-16 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 is 3.3× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Fable 5.1: 1,000,000 tokens. Kimi K3: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.1 ≈ $45,000, Kimi K3 ≈ $13,500.
More comparisons
Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeClaude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeClaude Fable 5.1 vs Command A+Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProClaude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProClaude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 SolClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedClaude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXClaude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProKimi K3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K3 vs Command A+Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K3 vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K3 vs GPT-6 SolKimi K3 vs Claude Opus 5.5