Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K2.6

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Fable 5.1

Anthropic
$10.00 / $50.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Kimi K2.6

Moonshot AI
$0.95 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
M
Verdict: Kimi K2.6 is 11.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (53.4 vs 27). Claude Fable 5.1 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Fable 5.1Kimi K2.6
Input price / 1M$10.00$0.95
Output price / 1M$50.00$4.00
Blended price (3:1)$20.00$1.71
Cached input / 1M$0.25$0.16
Context window1M262K
Max output128K236K
Intelligence index53.427
Coding index81.661.8
Providers422
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-012026-04-20
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is 11.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K2.6: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.1: 1,000,000 tokens. Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.1 ≈ $45,000, Kimi K2.6 ≈ $3,900.

More comparisons