Claude 3 Haiku vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude 3 Haiku

Anthropic
$0.25 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.5× cheaper than Claude 3 Haiku on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude 3 Haiku has the larger context window (200K vs 131K).
Claude 3 HaikuNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.25$0.20
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.50$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.03
Context window200K131K
Max output4K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2024-03-132026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude 3 Haiku or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.5× cheaper than Claude 3 Haiku on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude 3 Haiku vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Claude 3 Haiku: 200,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude 3 Haiku ≈ $1,125, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons