Aion 3.5 vs Llama Guard 4 12B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 20.8× cheaper than Aion 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Aion 3.5 has the larger context window (262K vs 164K).
| Aion 3.5 | Llama Guard 4 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $3.00 | $0.18 |
| Output price / 1M | $6.00 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.75 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.75 | — |
| Context window | 262K | 164K |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-09-23 | 2025-04-30 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Aion 3.5 or Llama Guard 4 12B?
Llama Guard 4 12B is 20.8× cheaper than Aion 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Aion 3.5 vs Llama Guard 4 12B: which has a bigger context window?
Aion 3.5: 262,144 tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Aion 3.5 ≈ $9,000, Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
Aion 3.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeAion 3.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeAion 3.5 vs Command A+Aion 3.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProAion 3.5 vs GPT-6 LunaAion 3.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProAion 3.5 vs GPT-6 SolAion 3.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Aion 3.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedAion 3.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashAion 3.5 vs Grok 4.7Aion 3.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashAion 3.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXAion 3.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashAion 3.5 vs GPT-6 AstraAion 3.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5