Aion 3.5 vs Command A+
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Command A+ is 6.3× cheaper than Aion 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Aion 3.5 has the larger context window (262K vs 192K).
| Aion 3.5 | Command A+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $3.00 | $0.30 |
| Output price / 1M | $6.00 | $1.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.75 | $0.60 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.75 | $0.15 |
| Context window | 262K | 192K |
| Max output | 33K | 64K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-22 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Aion 3.5 or Command A+?
Command A+ is 6.3× cheaper than Aion 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Aion 3.5 vs Command A+: which has a bigger context window?
Aion 3.5: 262,144 tokens. Command A+: 192,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Aion 3.5 ≈ $9,000, Command A+ ≈ $1,350.
More comparisons
Aion 3.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeAion 3.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeAion 3.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProAion 3.5 vs GPT-6 LunaAion 3.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProAion 3.5 vs GPT-6 SolAion 3.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Aion 3.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedAion 3.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashAion 3.5 vs Grok 4.7Aion 3.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashAion 3.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXAion 3.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashAion 3.5 vs GPT-6 AstraAion 3.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProAion 3.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 SolCommand A+ vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed