Aion 3.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 6.4× cheaper than Aion 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Aion 3.5 | GLM 5.3 FlashX | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $3.00 | $0.37 |
| Output price / 1M | $6.00 | $1.25 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.75 | $0.59 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.75 | $0.09 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-18 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Aion 3.5 or GLM 5.3 FlashX?
GLM 5.3 FlashX is 6.4× cheaper than Aion 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Aion 3.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX: which has a bigger context window?
Aion 3.5: 262,144 tokens. GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Aion 3.5 ≈ $9,000, GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365.
More comparisons
Aion 3.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeAion 3.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeAion 3.5 vs Command A+Aion 3.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProAion 3.5 vs GPT-6 LunaAion 3.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProAion 3.5 vs GPT-6 SolAion 3.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Aion 3.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedAion 3.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashAion 3.5 vs Grok 4.7Aion 3.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashAion 3.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashAion 3.5 vs GPT-6 AstraAion 3.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProAion 3.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Command A+GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Claude Opus 5.5