Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Sonar
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 4.3× cheaper than Sonar on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 127K).
| Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | Sonar | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.15 | $1.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.47 | $1.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.23 | $1.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.016 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 127K |
| Max output | 131K | 114K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2025-01-27 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash or Sonar?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 4.3× cheaper than Sonar on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Sonar: which has a bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. Sonar: 127,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00, Sonar ≈ $2,500.
More comparisons
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Grok 4.7Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 AstraQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Sonar vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSonar vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSonar vs Command A+Sonar vs GPT-6 Luna ProSonar vs GPT-6 LunaSonar vs GPT-6 Sol ProSonar vs GPT-6 SolSonar vs Claude Opus 5.5