Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Q

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.55 / $3.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Q
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 2.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (45.4 vs 18.4). Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M$0.55$2.00
Output price / 1M$3.50$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$1.29$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.23$0.25
Context window262K1M
Max output236K131K
Intelligence index18.445.4
Coding index48.276.2
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-02-162026-09-03
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 2.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Qwen3.5 397B A17B ≈ $2,850, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons