Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Q

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.40 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Q
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 5.7× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingQwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price / 1M$0.40$0.15
Output price / 1M$4.00$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$1.30$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.016
Context window131K1M
Max output33K131K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-09-232026-09-21
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 5.7× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ≈ $2,800, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons