Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Muse Glimmer 30B

Meta
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: Muse Glimmer 30B is 5.7× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Muse Glimmer 30BQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M$0.30$2.00
Output price / 1M$1.20$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.52$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.04$0.25
Context window131K1M
Max output16K131K
Intelligence index45.4
Coding index76.2
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-092026-09-03
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Muse Glimmer 30B is 5.7× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

Muse Glimmer 30B: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Muse Glimmer 30B ≈ $1,200, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons