Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral AI
$0.40 / $2.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: Mistral Medium 3.1 is 3.8× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (45.4 vs 9.2). Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Mistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M$0.40$2.00
Output price / 1M$2.00$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.80$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.04$0.25
Context window131K1M
Max output105K131K
Intelligence index9.245.4
Coding index20.576.2
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-08-132026-09-03
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Mistral Medium 3.1 is 3.8× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

Mistral Medium 3.1: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Mistral Medium 3.1 ≈ $1,800, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons