Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.8 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral AI
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.42 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.8 27B is 2.8× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (33.7 vs 14.2). Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Mistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8 27B
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.42
Output price / 1M$7.50$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$1.06
Cached input / 1M$0.085
Context window262K1M
Max output210K131K
Intelligence index14.233.7
Coding index46.968.1
Providers216
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-04-302026-08-14
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is 2.8× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Mistral Medium 3.5: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Mistral Medium 3.5 ≈ $6,750, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.

More comparisons